SomaSimple Discussion Lists  

Go Back   SomaSimple Discussion Lists > Physiotherapy / Physical Therapy / Manual Therapy / Bodywork > The Performance Lab
Albums Quiz PubMed Gray's Anatomy Tags Online Journals Statistics


The Performance Lab A place to discuss the role of physical exercise on health in diseased and non-diseased states.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-03-2017, 04:36 PM   #1
Jo Bowyer
ronin/matrix warrior
Jo Bowyer's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Bedford UK
Age: 59
Posts: 6,438
Thanks: 1,975
Thanked 2,734 Times in 1,657 Posts
Default Prevention of downhill walking-induced muscle damage by non-damaging downhill walking



Mountain trekking involves level, uphill, and downhill walking (DW). Prolonged DW induces damage to leg muscles, reducing force generating ability and muscle coordination. These increase risks for more serious injuries and accidents in mountain trekking, thus a strategy to minimize muscle damage is warranted. It has been shown that low-intensity eccentric contractions confer protective effect on muscle damage induced by high-intensity eccentric contractions. This study tested the hypothesis that 5-min non-damaging DW would attenuate muscle damage induced by 40-min DW, but 5-min level walking (LW) would not.


Untrained young men were allocated (n = 12/group) to either a control or one of the two preconditioning groups (PRE-DW or PRE-LW). The PRE-DW and PRE-LW groups performed 5-min DW (-28%) and 5-min LW, respectively, at 5 km/h with a load of 10% body mass, 1 week before 40-min DW (-28%, 5 km/h, 10% load). The control group performed 40-min DW only. Maximal knee extension strength, plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity, and muscle soreness (0–100 mm visual analogue scale) were measured before and 24 h after 5-min DW and 5-min LW, and before and 24, 48, and 72 h after 40-min DW.


No significant changes in any variables were evident after 5-min DW and 5-min LW. After 40-min DW, the control and PRE-LW groups showed significant (P<0.05) changes in the variables without significant differences between groups (control vs. PRE-LW; peak strength reduction: -19.2 ± 6.9% vs. -18.7 ± 11.0%, peak CK: 635.5 ± 306.0 vs. 639.6 ± 405.4 U/L, peak soreness: 81.4 ± 14.8 vs. 72.0 ± 29.2 mm). These changes were significantly (P<0.05) attenuated (47–64%) for the PRE-DW group (-9.9 ± 9.6%, 339.3 ± 148.4 U/L, 27.8 ± 16.8 mm).


The results supported the hypothesis and suggest that performing small volume of downhill walking is crucial in preparation for trekking.
Jo Bowyer
Chartered Physiotherapist Registered Osteopath.
"Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing,there is a field. I'll meet you there." Rumi
Jo Bowyer is online now   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tip happy walking ……. ian s General Discussion 4 26-11-2014 10:59 PM
Walking With Buckeye Barrett Dorko Barrett's Forums 6 12-07-2007 04:41 PM
"Good usability is like water flowing downhill" Diane Barrett's Forums 4 06-04-2007 06:55 AM
Virtual Walking bernard Try it, Use it or Lose it! 8 01-03-2005 11:52 AM

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SomaSimple © 2004 - 2016