|25-04-2012, 10:07 PM||#2|
Human Primate Social Groomer and Neuroelastician
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Weyburn Sask.
Thanked 8,380 Times in 3,822 Posts
I think that would make sense. It might not overlap exactly, but there would certainly be enough overlap that it could work.
Neurotonics PT Teamblog
Canadian Physiotherapy Pain Science Division (Archived newsletters, paincasts)
Canadian Physiotherapy Association Pain Science Division Facebook page
WCPT PhysiotherapyPainNetwork on Facebook
Neuroscience and Pain Science for Manual PTs Facebook page
SomaSimple on Facebook
"Rene Descartes was very very smart, but as it turned out, he was wrong." ~Lorimer Moseley
“Comment is free, but the facts are sacred.” ~Charles Prestwich Scott, nephew of founder and editor (1872-1929) of The Guardian , in a 1921 Centenary editorial
“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you, but if you really make them think, they'll hate you." ~Don Marquis
"In times of change, learners inherit the earth, while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists" ~Roland Barth
"Doubt is not a pleasant mental state, but certainty is a ridiculous one."~Voltaire
|26-04-2012, 04:07 AM||#3|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Thanked 82 Times in 36 Posts
"That means that the ultimate (in evolutionary terms) key principle behind all types of our interventions will be to "chill the defense"
I wouldn't have a problem with replacing output with defense if we can accept that a defense is a perfectly normal response. "Chilling the defense" would make no sense at all. The problem as I see it comes when the patient inhibits the process. I understand we could be splitting hairs here, but when it comes to the component of output we define here as ideomotion, nothing bad will occur with its expression.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Tip Touch in plants -> defense||Diane||General Discussion||5||09-04-2012 11:41 PM|
|Books on Motor Output||Diane||The Pharos of Alexandria||2||15-06-2006 10:38 AM|