Well, I agree with Bernard, and Randy did make the statement
which I have thought about, since.
To those who follow 'scientific' presentations without questioning their validity, we probably seem difficult.
Perhaps because they are not accustomed to questioning whatever come their way, regardless of references which can be manufactured, selective and sometimes way off.
Perhaps they are simply interested in results and outcomes, regardless of the hypothesis behind the presentations. We do not know how they explain the reasons behind pain and/or stiffness resolution to their clients/patients; and if the premise is that mobility means less pain, then that is correct.
What we try to do is look further, at specific reasons why mobility lessens pain; and this is the major moat separating us difficult ones from others. It doesn't seem to matter what resolves pain, until we explain to our patients what is going on.
Then it does matter.
Nari
we are a difficult crowd
To those who follow 'scientific' presentations without questioning their validity, we probably seem difficult.
Perhaps because they are not accustomed to questioning whatever come their way, regardless of references which can be manufactured, selective and sometimes way off.
Perhaps they are simply interested in results and outcomes, regardless of the hypothesis behind the presentations. We do not know how they explain the reasons behind pain and/or stiffness resolution to their clients/patients; and if the premise is that mobility means less pain, then that is correct.
What we try to do is look further, at specific reasons why mobility lessens pain; and this is the major moat separating us difficult ones from others. It doesn't seem to matter what resolves pain, until we explain to our patients what is going on.
Then it does matter.
Nari
Comment