It's decades since I supervised student osteopaths. The proceedure was that they took a case history and then brought it to the tutor for initial discussion before examining the patient. My student at the beginning of his fourth year was going through a dark night of the soul having come to the realisation that he wasn't going to be the saviour in a white tunic that he had been led to expect three years previously. His patient was a self employed carpenter who worked with his sons and had turned up at the sports clinic having tried everywhere else. He didn't do sport but had heard about us from a friend. He had a long history of recurrent eversion injuries to his ankle, had worn winkle picker shoes when they were the height of fashion in the '60s and was now hobbling around his workshop. The patient had been seen by an orthopaedic surgeon and had completed several courses of physiotherapy. Fusion of the joint had been suggested but the patient thought that "It was too final". We both went in to examine the gentleman who had high hopes that manipulation would get his stiff painful foot and ankle moving and cure his pain.
When we got back to the tutorial point, I asked the student what he intended to do with his patient. He said "Dunno, s'f*cked innit." I advised him not to write "s'f*cked innit" under diagnosis, mindful of the fact that I was going to have to countersign the case history sheet, but encouraged him to see it as a starting point. If we could get the patient to see the potential of fusion as a new beginning then something might be achieved.
We went back in and young Mr Potty-Mouth did a fine job of getting his patient on side.
I don't know what happened to the patient, but the student went on to build a successful family practice and was highly regarded by patients he sent to me in later years for opinion. They liked him because he "told it like it was" (Oh dear, I do hope not!) and if he couldn't help, tried to find someone who could and he wanted to know how they got on with whoever he sent them to.
Patients should not become dependent on their practitioners and they shouldn't feel discarded either.
When we got back to the tutorial point, I asked the student what he intended to do with his patient. He said "Dunno, s'f*cked innit." I advised him not to write "s'f*cked innit" under diagnosis, mindful of the fact that I was going to have to countersign the case history sheet, but encouraged him to see it as a starting point. If we could get the patient to see the potential of fusion as a new beginning then something might be achieved.
We went back in and young Mr Potty-Mouth did a fine job of getting his patient on side.
I don't know what happened to the patient, but the student went on to build a successful family practice and was highly regarded by patients he sent to me in later years for opinion. They liked him because he "told it like it was" (Oh dear, I do hope not!) and if he couldn't help, tried to find someone who could and he wanted to know how they got on with whoever he sent them to.
Patients should not become dependent on their practitioners and they shouldn't feel discarded either.
Comment