No announcement yet.

The Chestnut Challenge!

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • byronselorme
    started a topic CT The Chestnut Challenge!

    The Chestnut Challenge!

    I would like to lay down a Chestnut Challenge for all the members on SomaSimple.
    I will not deny the limitations of this challenge. But some of the rules I hope will allow freedom to hone in on your Theory Of Everything.

    Why Chestnut Challenge? Because I like the fact that a chestnut looks like a miniature brain (I know the walnut usually gets this title but I still prefer the chestnut). The idea of the challenge being to get to your core understanding and specific Theory Of Everything as only you can best encapsulate it "in a nutshell".

    Anyone who is a member of SS can write here but I hope you will respect the idea of this Thread.

    Here are the rules:
    1) 400 words max. Brevity is the hardest part I know, but maybe this constraint will force you to a new level of elucidation.
    2) 1 entry on this thread per member. Unlimited edits of that entry.
    3) If your edit is because you have a new understanding that contradicts an old one, separate and move the old idea to the bottom of your post and [date it], make a (*) where the modified entry is entered so that others can see your evolution (this is not necessary for grammar or wording clean up).
    4) No links, quotes, or outside references. Original thoughts in your own words only.
    5) No rebuttals, attacks, or defenses of any other entries. Save it for other threads.
    6) No rants about any other system or belief. This is your 2 paragraphs of what you believe is most important about the/your ideas expressed here.

    Here is what I plan to use this thread for:
    This page will be used as a link in other places that I post/write but it will always be a link so that if your understanding/concept evolves, it will be the most recent version that others see. I would like to expose more people to SS via this challenge.

    If you think that any of these points above need revisions or outright changes, post to the discussion thread here so that we can keep on point with each of the posts in this one.

    I hope that many of you accept this challenge. I am currently working on my own entry but have to admit it is a tough one.

    Try to answer this question "What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is...."

    That’s 400 words up to here.
    Jon Newman started a discussion thread here for questions [added July 18, 2011]
    "Leave old idea intact but put the strikethrough over it" [removed July 30, 2011]
    Last edited by byronselorme; 30-07-2011, 11:47 PM. Reason: Revised Rule 3)

  • Chocco
    The one thing I know is that I don't know anything and that is OK.

    I believe that we are not a complex combination of body systems and functions, but one system that funtions off of memories, lessons, beliefs and functions that we have learned since we were born. Neurology, pscyhology, etc. gives us a way to study and learn the human body and human experience, but they don't truly exist. You function as one unit. You don't call on one specific system, you call on your memories, your lessons, your experiences and your beliefs and we use the to respond to whatever we need to. If this is true, then everyone's experience is unique to them and every patient needs to be treated as the unique individual that they are.

    I believe that science is the best weapon on learning how to treat patients effectively, but I dont think it does a good job of showing us why. In studies the conclusion derived from the experiment are tainted by bias and are limited by our lack of knowledge. I believe the data and the results of well designed scientific studies move us much more forward as a profession and a society than the assumptions that someone conveys to explain why. I am not saying that we should not ask why or try to answer why. I am saying that we shouldn't be foolish enough to think we know why, when over time we know we will most likely be proven wrong. This will allow us to be a more versatile profession and society and help prevent the spreading information that will be proven incorrect years from now.

    i believe that pain is a personal experience created by someone else's brain. It is very likely that you don't/can't feel the same pain your patient feels.

    I believe that PTs need to understand "psychology". Not specific models or theories but an understanding of the impact that their words and actions have on their patients

    I believe a lot things but the one thing I know is that...
    ​​​​​​​I don't know anything and I am ok with that and so are my patients.

    Leave a comment:

  • TribalPhysio
    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is…both are complex interactions occurring within and between living organisms. While we have improved in our understanding of pain, the mechanics of its expression much like consciousness, remain elusive. For all we have learned, pain remains perplexing. It is a perception that is produced in response to either perceived/actual damage in an effort to protect the organism. It’s expression pre-determined by genetics, but is shaped by our environment and experiences. The brain’s perception of threat is malleable, changing based on our perception of both our internal/external environment, as well as our history and past life experiences; it is strongly influenced by psycho-social concepts I once found frustrating, as “things” that distracted me from what I thought mattered..the BIO (strength, ROM, conditioning, joint mobility). In reality, each individual’s pain experience is largely influenced by an interaction between each component of their particular bio-psycho-social profile.

    Much of my journey in therapy was related to finding the “right” system to address my patients concerns, which coincidentally reflected my own concerns. “What is wrong with me [you]? How is therapy going to help me [you]? Why do I [you] still hurt?” These questions have led to the development of complicated algorithms and contradictory systems of evaluation and treatment. All of these may have some effect, some of the time…or none whatsoever. Many of these treatment paradigms have their own belief systems, their own theories, as to what is happening when Q-R-S is observed or X-Y-Z is performed; none have served to clarify the patient’s experience sufficiently. As I’ve grown as a therapist and examined my own preconceptions and misunderstandings, I have begun to see therapy for what it is…an interaction between two organisms, that is influenced by the murky interaction between both specific and non-specific effects. This has allowed me to view each system for its strengths and weaknesses and allowed me to embrace uncertainty in my approach; I can focus on what matters to my patients without getting bogged down by the minutiae of different systems. I can provide them independence, get them moving without unsubstantiated rules set by creators of systems, and provide methods for self-management based on their presentation and lived experience.


    Zachary Huff, PT, DPT, OCS

    Leave a comment:

  • Milehigh
    What I have learned about pain and therapy is....

    Starting with nociception, which forms the basic homeostatic warning system in the human organism, nociceptors are in all tissues. The human organism attempts to deal with changes in nociception input reflexively and instinctively first. When sufficient nociception is attended to by higher centers of the CNS we become aware of it. Like many things in human biology and perception, this warning system is imperfect and subject to all sorts of distortions and illusions due to these imperfections.

    Pain is the expression of these sensations. Pain is expressed through language so therefore was created by culture. The meaning of the pain expression is learned through the individuals social and culture interactions. Thus it is culturally, socially and individually relativistic. Unlike nociception which is nonconscious and is not communicated in any meaningful way between beings. The attribution of pain to a sensorial experience is dependent on a convergent and multimodal sensorial experience and therefore is not exclusively dependent on nociception. Otherwise stated, a person learns to express pain based on their unique sensorial experience, nociception only being a part of, mediated by the persons culturally learned language.

    Evolutionarily, the expression of pain, from person to person, patient to practitioner, is used to express danger but also to signal a need for help. It begins with acute pain. The transition from acute pain to chronic pain is mediated by pain being “lost in translation”. From the perspective of the patient, they are unrelieved from solely a biomechanical attribution of their pain and the subsequent interventions that follow. From the perspective of western medicine, the patient’s pain is not real because it does not fit the biomechanical model. The patient’s expression and experience is ALWAYS vivid, real and relevant. It is the perpetuation of this language barrier that permits chronic pain to persist in so many patients.

    The language of pain is strongest tool therapists have. The tool is used implicitly when we help ascribe new meanings to the patient’s internal sensations that fit the new science of pain. It is used explicitly when we directly inform them on pain education.

    When approaching the organism of another, they should be approached through empathy and understanding resisting any attempt to label them. The most effective interventions delivered are those that are interactive. Those interventions that interact with whole of the person’s organism have the largest chance of impacting the person’s perception and function.
    Last edited by Milehigh; 30-11-2011, 06:02 AM. Reason: Grammar

    Leave a comment:

  • HeadStrongPT
    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is...

    We couldn't survive without pain. It’s an essential element of any species that wants to stick around on this planet for any length of time.

    Pain wasn't likely a "problem" to our ancestors. You either learned from it and survived, or you didn't. We are much smarter than they were yet somehow we’ve managed to develop a very maladaptive relationship with pain. Our pathological obsessions of embracing and/or avoiding pain have prevented us from understanding pain. Modern society has managed to suppress this very basic instinct, and now we have problem with pain.

    Patients need the wisdom to see when pain has a purpose and when it doesn't. They need to understand that constructively coping with a painful problem is a strategy that allowed us to become the dominant species on this planet. Passive coping such as reliance upon polypharmacy, medical specialists (including PTs), devices, etc. is not a healthy or sustainable practice.

    Any intervention targeting a painful problem should attempt to elicit the patient's own instinctive ability to recover. No matter what therapy tribe or association you belong, this process starts and ends with the brain and the patient's potential to use it.

    Our ancestors responded to pain like they did many other life events - they moved. Physical therapists, presumably holding court in the fields of movement science, should be at the forefront of helping patients explore this relationship. There are plenty of ways we can help patients overcome painful problems. We are the best option for patients struggling with pain, but we are also part of the problem.

    Exercise is necessary for a healthy life, but patients should be allowed to move comfortably before they are urged to move with effort. The nervous system learns every step of the way. We should always be asking ourselves what we are teaching it.

    I’ve learned that even small shifts in our understanding can lead to significant improvements in patient care. These aren’t “soft” changes either. I’m seeing improved patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and more cost-efficient care. All this results from paying more attention to the patient’s chief complaint!

    Acting on our understanding of pain will allow physical therapy to be the “sleeping giant” Patrick Wall envisioned.
    Last edited by HeadStrongPT; 20-08-2011, 05:21 AM. Reason: argh... grammar

    Leave a comment:

  • ian s
    not so brief.....

    “Yup. It's complicated. In the end, whatever happens in any treatment encounter is an outcome of two unique nervous systems interacting with each other, not a set of protocols enacted by a zombie robot upon the anatomical body parts of a human in pain in an operative fashion.” Diane Jacobs

    ‘Pain the science of suffering’ contained an iconic paragraph on the stages of recovery (or not) This key paragraph continues to influence my daily life and work. Critically, for Physical therapists of all affiliations, Wall described the importance of motor acts and the universal human desire in seeking safety, relief and cure.
    Models of pain, physiological understanding, the dissemination and integration of stress biology have all influenced my own approach and understanding. Neurogenesis may provide optimism or pessimistic ‘realism’ as behaviours stay ‘wired’ with repetition.
    Quite rightly science guides health care practice and discussion on pain related subjects. It is assumed that pathophysiological knowledge and brain science will lead to enhanced understanding and hopefully better forms of intervention. In some situations this is certainly true but in many aspects of modern health care science cannot (I believe) provide all the answers to the problems of pain and suffering.
    My own belief is that individual brains can be studied but the nuanced interaction of people, environments, values and cultural influences lead to infinitesimal variations in pain behaviour. There are limits in other words of how much science can contribute to the project of understanding people.
    Other subjects may help the understanding of how people cope and how they make sense of the world without recourse to metaphysics.
    Understanding ‘meaning responses’ and the cultural forces, which shape belief and values, are critical in understanding pain and inter-related placebo or negative nocebo reactions. ‘Iatroplacebogenesis’ or factors, which may contribute to it, could be a goal of all future therapists interacting with patients in pain!
    One ‘simple’ thing I have learned in regards to pain is the importance of metaphor and how it shapes ones understanding. Pain, understood as a verb rather than a noun for example affects ones perception and the naïve objectivity placed on this complex topic.
    I believe that the ‘verb’ of pain needs therapists who are aware and familiar with modern science but who are also aware of the need to understand the affect they themselves have on patients. Pain (particularly chronic pain) needs creative solutions and alternative explanations; reading, curiosity, cultural understanding and self-development may all be helpful things to cultivate.

    Leave a comment:

  • bernard
    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is...

    That unfortunately (?) I forgot quite all the things I learned at PT school...
    I started to lurk at NOI discussion lists in 2003 and thought it was some alien forum since neurology and neurophysiology was not a priority for me and the majority of colleagues! Really?
    Then I studied I was wrong at both ends:

    That complex nervous system, running everywhere in our body, was of major importance and like a bad boy it may be sometimes irritable and angry when our action is not well understood or accepted by its owner: the patient.

    Some years later, the major lessons I apply each day are :

    • The first one is Listen and Learn!
    • The second one is Less is More!

    Leave a comment:

  • BB
    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is....

    Whenever you interact with another, you cannot help but impact their thoughts and actions, their behavior. In other words, you are manipulative like it or not.

    We are paid to interact and impact behavior. This is our job.

    Our impact is indirect. We require the interpretation of another despite the medium of interaction, whether it be touch, talk, presence, or expectation.

    In order to affect behavior purposefully we must create a space for interpretation that creates a path. This is our craft.

    The ability to create paths to specific behavior, to manipulate, means that we must utilize the tools and information available to create paths which make people better by their own standards, as measured by our standards. This is our responsibility.

    Science is the method that best informs this responsibility.

    Story is the method in which it is best conveyed.

    I’ve learned that pain is

    1) unavoidable, while many of its consequences are avoidable
    2) something that occurs with and without injury
    3) a felt sense while nociception is a non-conscious sensation

    I’ve learned to account for phantom limb and asymptomatics in my arguments for or against mechanism. I’ve learned that I’m often wrong and that isn’t the end of the world so long as I move forward.

    I’ve learned that a sense of autonomy tends to correlate with a sense of coping ability and the manners in which we interact have profound impact on the others sense of autonomy. It is preferable for a person to sense that change came from them instead of being done to them.
    Last edited by BB; 04-08-2011, 06:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:

  • Luke Rickards
    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is....
    that there is a difference between pain and the problem of pain.

    We do our best to understand the causes and effects of pain, and that understanding has improved enormously. However the experience of pain and its manifestations are inherently unpredictable. This isn't going to change.

    Pain is a part of life. Obviously it is more a part of some people's lives than other's, and for the very unfortunate it is a significant part of life. However responses to this experience are complex and hugely variable and this often has little correlation with the intensity of physical sensations. The problem of pain does not arise from the sensory aspects of pain, but the anxiety and distress and fear associated with these sensations, and this is predominantly psychosocial.

    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is...
    that the more we focus on the pain and therapy for the pain the more likely we are to fail, especially in chronic pain. People in pain need to be empowered. They need to learn that they are safe, even with the pain, and why. They need self-efficacy, that is, the confidence to respond instinctively and creatively to their own pain experience. And as for everyone, they might need to be reminded to choose behaviours that we know make for a healthy and fulfilling experience of life.

    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is....
    whether or not we approve of a particular method, both positive and negative responses can occur from a huge range of 'therapeutic' inputs, and predicting the relative response of individuals to a specific treatment isn't always easy. No matter what else we do in the name of therapy, people in pain must be approached with the understanding that there is a nervous system under threat in your hands.
    Last edited by Luke Rickards; 13-08-2011, 07:59 PM. Reason: Removed intro on request

    Leave a comment:

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is....

    The neurophysiology and neurobiology of pain needs to be taught as a core competency in all medical and allied care disciplines from the very beginning. It is virtually impossible to end up with odd notions of muscle imbalance and postural dysfunction as a cause of disease when you have an firm understanding of neuroscience as it pertains to pain.

    I have learned regardless of raspberries from conflicted interests, the Neuromatrix Theory of Pain by Ronald Melzack is still the best explanation of pain currently available. It is still critically examined in publications and modifications are happening as new discoveries about mind and consciousness are made. Lorimer Moseley has done an incredible job of making the neuromatrix diagram into a learning, teaching and treatment tool I would be lost without.

    I have learned the basic resolution to pain of mechanical origin is not to ignore the prodrome and move. The brain will move us to protect its nervous tissue. It is a great system that we over-ride and ignore at our peril.

    The knowledge I have acquired about pain is my greatest ally when I meet a person with pain. The more complex presentations of pain are interesting and challenging for me on many levels. However I try to not lose sight of the fact that there is a person on the other end of the semantics. A person who needs understanding and real care.

    The thing about pain I look forward most to learning is; what is the precise mechanism for the perception in the brain of pain. Then many of the arguments creating chasms will fall to the side.

    If I could be anything else tomorrow morning at 8:00am. I would be a researcher in Ellen A Lumkin's lab or the new guy on my radar Gary R Lewen. PubMed search them. They are among the top skin researchers in the world. If they wouldn't have me they I'd beg Lorimer Moseley if I could clean windows at his house.

    One final comment, The hands can see pain better than the eyes, the can hands hear pain when language fails, the hands may move tissue but the brain moves pain.

    Karen Lines RMT
    Last edited by Karen L; 27-07-2011, 12:21 AM. Reason: its it's

    Leave a comment:

  • Jason Silvernail
    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is....
    …that understanding the physiology and psychology of pain should completely change everything about the way you approach clinical life and should immediately cause you to reject most of what passes for treatment in medicine and therapy.

    The most powerful parts of this idea is understanding what we now know about the origins of pain (we put them into four origins here) and understanding that psychosocial aspects play a part in the experience. This knowledge helps you realize you must find a sensible way to address mechanical pain from "issues in the tissues" and find a way to relate to people and translate the available evidence into a treatment philosophy.

    Issues in the tissues we can address are mechanical in nature, so that means movement. Manual therapy (passive movement), active and ideomotor movement are sources of this. Not ultrasound, lasers, rubbing something with a steel bar or plastic wedge, poking it with a needle, injecting it with something, or cutting it out. Mechanical pain needs movement – full stop. Throw the other crap away - and there's a lot of crap. A detailed and skilled exam can help you find the most relevant places to treat with targeted passive movement and motor control/neuroscience knowledge helps you conduct sensible active movement. This helps you focus on things that really make sense and helps put more control in your patient’s hands. It also helps you decide which therapeutic approaches make sense to pursue when you are considering advanced training – which I think makes a huge difference in your ability to address these peripheral problems.

    Psychosocial and cognitive approaches don't require that you become a clinical psychologist but that you have a broad concept of the influence of those factors and that you account for them in your encounters with your patients. Know the literature and be able to give management advice based on evidence. When people come to see you they want a plan. Have a plan that is defensible and that works toward their goals. Address concerns, fear avoidance, other stress, and unhelpful beliefs with compassion, understanding, empathy, and informed knowledge.

    Understanding why people hurt is part of our professional responsibility and should change most everything we do on a daily basis away from traditional methods and towards methods defensible with modern science.
    Last edited by Jason Silvernail; 24-07-2011, 09:04 PM. Reason: paragraph tabs didn't take - added blank lines.

    Leave a comment:

  • gollygosh
    I graduated in 1982 at which time part of standard operating procedure was to stretch patients with limited range until faces were quite literally red. Incomprehensibly, some of those patients achieved their range, strength, and function goals.

    Whether it was the message of my Alma Mater, or the message I chose to hear, I had the impression that as long as I provided for the safety of my patient, I was free to try many interventions in pursuit of the patient's goals. With that permission to be creative, I tried several courses which while totally missing the science behind what they were doing, invited me to be less and less physically aggressive. In addition a Trager class I took, introduced me to the idea that we were working with the brain. I am married to black belt in karate, and together we took a couple of T'ai Qi classes, which further softened my approach to patients emphasizing not only gentler touch, but more exploratory, and less right movements. This approach led me away from the protocol driven patient diagnoses, and more and more into the realm of the pain patients who nobody knew what to do with. I remember in one billing discussion, one of co-workers told me that I should probably use the neuro muscular re-ed charge most of the time.

    At that point I took the Simple Contact class, and loved it. I began integrated the information, and the pursuit of self correction in a more deliberate fashion. Because I am an "e-phobe" it took me way too long to soma simple, and I continued to bungle around following my intuition.

    In November I overcame my e-phobia enough to accept the invitation Barrett Dorko extends to all his students, and joined Soma Simple. At that point I learned that while intuition is great, it is no substitute for knowledge. I realized that I have a lot of learning to do. Pain is an output from the brain. That sentence turns most of what we are taught to "do" to our patients upside down. It challenges every intervention to be an appeal to the brain through every portal available. The brain, and the nervous system are more intricate than could have been imagined, and therefore hold many opportunities for the resolution.
    Last edited by gollygosh; 25-07-2011, 07:25 AM. Reason: finish sentence; correct date.

    Leave a comment:

  • byronselorme
    I spent 14 years in public school and hated most of the later years. 5 years of that in High School, well I got it done at least. 4 years in College studying Mechanical Engineering, mostly bored but enjoying the changing lifestyle and getting it finished. I thought education was a torture. I guess I forgot that I hated education so I became enamoured with personal and emotional development leading to some extra-curricular University courses in psychology, which I loved.

    Unfortunately, through this entire path, there was no education in how to think critically. 18 years of education and I was still taken by any idea that “felt” good and gave me the “warm and fuzzies”. No wonder I found Yoga so exciting.

    Enter a Car accident at the end of 2001 and, of course, with positivism and Yoga I was going to heal myself in no time. Not a complete fool, when this initially happened I visited...ahem….my own MD, 4 PT’s, 2 Osteopaths, 2 RMT’s, 1 Chiropractor, 1 bored Kinesiologist, 2 Acupuncturists, 2 Psychologists, 2 Physiatrists, 1 Podiatrist, 3 Designated Assessment Centers, 4 Lawyers, 5 MRI’s, 2 EMG’s, 3 XRAY’s, 3 Ultrasounds, Several Yoga Therapists, a genuine Indian Bonesetter (in India no less), repeated Kiss records, and finally a Neurologist. Not once did anyone explain pain to me.

    Sick of the repeated trial and disillusionment I decided to school myself in critical thinking. I bought books, subscribed to newsletters, and visited Blogs that specialized in debunking. I learned as much as I could (and still counting). I started to seriously debunk the claims in my own Yoga profession which led to some startling and disheartening discoveries. Strength and flexibility doesn’t help with pain????

    Somehow my old interests in psychology still led me forward on a parallel track to all of this studying. The developments in neuroscience and enthralling neuroplasticity captivated me. I remember reading in a GNC store in 1999 “The brain does grow new neurons in later life!” I didn’t realize how big a shift was occurring.

    I ended up at a website that connected everything I was studying, struggling with and completely committed to. I discovered what pain was and what true scientific debate coupled with myriad curiousities could lead to and it wasn’t agreement. It was refreshing and never-ending learning. It was patient / client centered, brain, consciousness and non-consciousness based. It was just SomaSimple.
    Last edited by byronselorme; 25-07-2011, 12:41 AM. Reason: Removed Paragraph Spaces

    Leave a comment:

  • Jon Newman
    What people need to know that I have learned about pain and therapy is....

    I’ve learned that pain is both a sensory and emotional experience which is usually described as tissue damage even when there isn’t any. Also, the experience is unpleasant for the experiencer. What I think is important to note is that
    1. Pain is the subjective experience and necessarily occurs as a process in the brain and
    2. To produce an experience of pain the brain typically uses pathways that involve motivated behavior under all but very unusual circumstances. It is debatable whether those unusual circumstances can be defined as pain (e.g. the experience of a lobotomized patient to noxious stimuli.)

    I’ve learned that hyperalgesia--having a pain experience in response to an increasing range of stimuli, including nondamaging stimuli--is the name of the chief complaint of most patients in the clinic.

    I’ve learned that pain is to be distinguished from nociception (the neural process of transducing and transmitting noxious stimuli) while simultaneously acknowledging that nociceptive pain is more prevalent than neuropathic pain in the general population (my conjecture).

    I’ve learned that there is no “pain center” in the brain. Rather there is a widespread network of cells whose specific pattern of firing creates the experience of pain and this network and pattern is dynamic, or at least potentially so.

    I’ve learned that any therapy can be conceptualized as mechanical, chemical or thermal stimuli which affects the pattern of activation of the brain. These stimuli could be taken up a level of analysis and be classified as being in the biological, psychological, social/cultural domains and a particular stimulus may accurately be classified in any or all the domains.

    I’ve learned that the context of the stimuli and patient expectations can interact in unpredictable ways but there seems to be a general principle that creating contexts that are congruent with patient goals (i.e. not threatening) are helpful, if not critical, for the patient to reach resolution. Learning what the patient considers threatening (goal thwarting) and effectively avoiding that environment are important aspects of therapy.

    I’ve learned that patients can’t act on their therapist’s desires. They can only act on their own desires but this can include their desire to please their therapistsomeone else [or other interests of the self (such as it is).]

    I’ve learned that unhelpful cognitions (i.e. beliefs) can slow, if not defeat, the resolution of pain.

    I’ve learned that it is okay for PTs to address cognitions related to patient treatment goals.

    Do I have any unhelpful cognitions? I’m open to criticism/revision.
    Last edited by Jon Newman; 30-11-2011, 06:11 AM. Reason: added to sentence--see bracketed area.

    Leave a comment:

  • ginger
    My own real journey towards the clinical practices I now employ, began when I took a job as a sole physio in an isolated islander community in the Torres Straight of far north Queensland, in my second year after graduation, 1987. I had been taught a raft of local and spinal treatments that I quickly became frustrated with. For the most part , these methods didn't work.
    One patient, the bishop's wife, had a painful shoulder that I had been ultrasounding, stretching and worrying over for weeks with only minimal effect. Till the day I treated her neck, using the Maitland mobilising method I had been taught, and presto, her shoulder improved dramatically. This seminal moment, led me on my real journey.

    Over the years I found that the more I mobilised spinal joints, the better the results. Progressively I abandoned the localised MSK treatments that didn't work to concentrate on the spine. I found that a wide range of MSK problems , that I had been taught were of either mysterious origin or disease states, responded well to spinal treatment.
    My approach, originally pure Maitland, evolved over time , gradually losing elements of little value and concentrating on that which induced the strongest changes. This method is now sufficiently different to warrant a name for itself, thanks to posters here on SS and on RE it is now known as Continuous Mobilisation (CM).
    I have sought to explain CM related treatment effects as best I can , drawing on neuroscience and my own observations ,by writing a theoretical model that seeks to explain the effects of CM and of spinal movements generally.
    The essence of which is that the spine, along with other major systems and organs , has a threat response. The nature of this response is to limit spinal movement, the effect of which is ultimately, pain, altered sensations and altered patterns of recruitment of spinal and other muscle. It is by restoring normal non threat states of movement to the spine, that many pain and dysfunction issues can be resolved, whch had been caused by interference to nerve function at the spine.
    Progressive acceptance of and use of this notion of spinal protective behaviour and it's effects, are noted in the literature generally since first posting these ideas in 2005.
    I acknowledge the contributions to my thinking by the scientific community gathered here, which has , by small increments, lead me to believe there is value in sharing, in mentoring and in staying in touch with the science of pain.

    Leave a comment: