The previous blog posts, Four Questions and How I see the invisible didn't raise the ire within the therapy community I thought they might.
Underlying both posts is the problem of invisibility.
When something isn't readily seen with the naked eye or understood to exist in a certain way, humans speculate. We use things we're familiar with as metaphors. But the things that therapists have chosen aren't a whole lot like the person we actually treat.
I've said that the nervous tissue “floats around” within us and it seems that regular pursuit of the desired task is a good idea.
Mel Siff always advocated this.
Thoughts?
Underlying both posts is the problem of invisibility.
When something isn't readily seen with the naked eye or understood to exist in a certain way, humans speculate. We use things we're familiar with as metaphors. But the things that therapists have chosen aren't a whole lot like the person we actually treat.
I've said that the nervous tissue “floats around” within us and it seems that regular pursuit of the desired task is a good idea.
Mel Siff always advocated this.
Thoughts?
Comment