Luke, you likely already saw this one: An Analysis of the Ideomotor Principle and TOTE It compares TOTE with "IMP" (the ideomotor principle).
I find the writing easier to grasp than Prinz's.. although it still seems pretty elusive to me.
The ideomotor principle (IMP), which was proposed multiple times during the 19th century [12, 19], hypothesizes a bidirectional action-effect linkage in which the desired (perceptual) effect triggers the execution of the action that previously caused that effect. The test operate test exit (TOTE) model of cybernetics [24] proposes goal-oriented action control.
In the ideomotor view, in a sense, causality, as present in the real world, is reversed in the inner world. A mental representation of the intended effect of an action is the cause of the action: here it is not the action that produces the effect, but the effect that produces the action. [25, par. 21.5] describes an “automatic mechanism” realizing this principle (see Fig 1): when the features of, say, an
apple are endogenously activated, an automatic mechanism is oriented toward (seeing or grasping) apples teleonomically.
apple are endogenously activated, an automatic mechanism is oriented toward (seeing or grasping) apples teleonomically.
Comment