PDA

View Full Version : Cross Country 63 - Yesterday's Weather


Barrett Dorko
09-12-2006, 06:08 PM
It’s been a quiet week in Cuyahoga Falls…

On the elevator in my hotel in Houston on Friday I noticed some announcements and bits of information posted. The one that caught my eye was “Yesterday’s Weather.” I had to get out and didn’t take the time to read what it said beneath but felt that I didn’t really need to anyway; I’d been there the day before and I pretty much remembered what it was like. And then I began to wonder why anyone would care about such a thing. It stuck in my head and I told the class that I thought I’d found the hook for this week’s column.

As luck would have it, I found myself standing in the “A” line in preparation for boarding my Southwest Airlines flight for home later that day. Two men in front of me began talking about how the weather might be where they were headed. Then they began to trade stories about the weather here and there that they were familiar with, weather that they’d only heard of, different types of weather in far flung locations, snow removal problems in Detroit, early arriving coldness in central Missouri, the nature of wind driven waves as described by The Discovery Channel last month and other fascinating minutiae about our climate. I could feel my eyes start to cross.

My teaching might commonly be described as “arresting” to many of the therapists attending. Perhaps “disturbing” would be a better word. I don’t think that this is because they don’t understand me or that I’m not easy to listen to though I might be wrong about that. I think it’s because I speak about things related to manual management that no one expects. People arrive totally unprepared, and they have always assumed that chronic pain is driven and perpetuated by forces so vast, powerful, insidious and invisible that they can’t really do much more than blame these things for the failure of therapy to help much.

Therapists expect me to address the issues of secondary gain, malingering, laziness, the repetitive strain inherent to work, insurance policies and productivity mandates that severely restrict any sort of individualized care. Anatomically they wonder about irreversible connective tissue degeneration, pathology in need of surgical repair and painful disease processes for which there is no effective therapeutic intervention possible. I address virtually none of this. Instead, I focus upon the anatomy and physiology that we are perfectly capable of changing with our special knowledge and skill. I talk about understanding behaviors that can be changed rapidly and dramatically with a little specific education. Most of my students aren’t ready for any of this.

To me, the public’s general fascination with the weather isn’t so much about its variability as its absolute inevitability. Each day we are faced with something that has no interest whatsoever in our desire to change it. So, we admire it, complain about it, worry about its future expression and talk endlessly about the ways we’ve seen it change things. The famous line from Mark Twain, “Everybody talks about the weather but nobody ever does anything about it,” is true on several levels.

I think there’s a connection with therapists’ general fascination with the things in their patients and the profession over which they have no control. They talk about them endlessly, and when I’m nearby I can feel my eyes start to cross. Beyond boredom I grow annoyed and wonder aloud why my colleagues don’t put some effort into reading about the things they can change, things like our patient’s physiology and use. It’s not that hard, really.

But once a thing is controllable it becomes less interesting to many, I guess. After all, if they invented a weather machine I wonder how many would favor such predictability and controllable power over this thing that ordinarily gives us such a feeling of community. After all, the two men in my line had never before met, but they conversed continuously for over half an hour about their shared experience. Of course, I’ve seen women do this about shoes, but that’s a whole other column.

Perhaps the disturbing thing about my teaching is its implication that control over many aspects of those things we know perpetuate painful sensation can be had with a little understanding and unique care. In effect, I’m inviting therapists to leave the safety and familiarity of the herd; to forget about the weather for a while, especially yesterday’s.

I show them how to create an environment with their hands and a context with their knowledge and presence that sets them apart from a profession that dwells upon what can’t be changed yet discusses it endlessly and with a great deal of resignation.

Weather talk is “small talk.” None of what I say to my classes can be classified as that. What I speak of is unexpected and its implications are profound.

No wonder the disturbance.

nari
10-12-2006, 12:53 AM
Small talk is the art of getting as many people as possible to agree that a topic is worth complaining about. It separates the bonobos from the chimps and the doers from the followers; and there is always enough of each to spread around so that almost nobody feels out of it, most of the time.
However it should come with a defined time limit - around half an hour, whether in a line, a plane, a car or shopping for shoes (which I never do).

Weather-wise, Barrett, you probably seem like a low pressure trough followed by a front. People like high pressure weather. Except in Oz....at present.

Nari

Barrett Dorko
10-12-2006, 04:11 PM
All of this weather talk has gotten me thinking about my workshop’s aftermath and how easily therapists resist the changes it might have produced.

Nari’s reference to Oz (Australia in this case) conjures images of the original Oz as described by L. Frank Baum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Frank_Baum). At the center of his most famous story is the weather; weather in its most violent form – a tornado.

I’ve written a number of essays about the movie “The Wizard of Oz” including Surrender, Dorothy (http://www.barrettdorko.com/articles/surrender.htm) that, I think, might help us understand the nature of change, whether it’s in our patients or our therapeutic approach. It includes this quote from Joey Green’s iThe Zen of Oz (http://www.amazon.com/Zen-Oz-Spiritual-Lessons-Rainbow/dp/1580630200).


There is a distinct difference between your desire and your intention. When you desire something, you are attached to the outcome. Intention, on the other hand, is desire without any attachment to the outcome. You intend to do something, but you are no longer obsessed with the idea. By letting go of desire and by participating with detached involvement, you open yourself to infinite possibilities, allowing your destiny to unfold spontaneously- in tune with the fluidity of the cosmos.

The essay that follows is about what I try to get my patients to understand about corrective movement, but here I’d like to talk about what I’d like to get my students to understand about the changes that might occur in their practice if only they’d let go of their desire to magically solve their patient’s dysfunction with some special manipulation.

I’ll begin by asking here what Dorothy learned and how she learned it. Contrast this with what Aunty Em and the rest of her friends at the farm didn’t learn and why.

Here's a clue: read the essay.

BB
10-12-2006, 07:33 PM
Hi Barrett,
I’ll begin by asking here what Dorothy learned and how she learned it.

It seems that by going deeper into oz and seemingly further away from her destination she learned something about herself. Maybe something akin to awareness, which eventually got her to where she desired.

Contrast this with what Aunty Em and the rest of her friends at the farm didn’t learn and why.

Well, since they didn't go through Oz they didn't acheive this awareness. They didn't achieve any change in what they understood about themselves. Also, they didn't really understand the change that had happened in Dorothy.

Barrett Dorko
10-12-2006, 10:59 PM
You're right, I think.

Dorothy ran from the status quo and first encounters a sociopathic conman - Professor Marvel. He steals her picture of Aunty Em, one of the few treasures she has, and then sends her into a storm while he sees after his horse.

They're into a departure from science, reality and rationality. Many therapists never return.

I don’t know that I’m the storm, but I’m often standing there when therapists come wandering down the road. They’re dissatisfied with the work they’ve found themselves doing and (unfortunately) remarkably naïve. Most importantly, they’re seeking simplicity. It’s not often that whatever I say has much effect and I suspect that it’s because only complexity is to found when we look at neurobiology. I focus on this, of course.

So, how do so many avoid being affected? Easy, they run home fast enough to dive into the storm cellar before Uncle Henry closes the door. In fact, I can almost see them inching toward the safety of their clinics as I speak.

Diane
10-12-2006, 11:29 PM
As I recall, Barrett, correct me if I'm wrong (many years since I saw this movie or read the book) Dorothy tried to save her dog and that's how she ended up being sucked away in the first place. Perhaps the dog represents a bond with her own nonconscious functions - she sides with her'self' as represented by Toto (Spanish word for "everything" is "todo".. coincidence?) and not with the conventional safe way of going about selfpreservation, i.e., going meekly into the cellar.

As I recall the thing she learns is "There's no place like home" which is also the little mantra that brings her back to Kansas and to her bed.

I remember Peter Levine used this story as a metaphor for psychic trauma, with the tornado being the event that shatters self, and the possibility of making one's way back "home" (collecting the pieces, fitting them together seamlessly), by relying on the "wild" (nonconscious) parts of the brain to do all the work, suspending conscious interference with the processing.

Professor Marvel could be a symbol of authority or the outer world trying to intrude on the process, in this interpretation, I think.

nari
10-12-2006, 11:34 PM
This is a good topic, but it is clear I'll have to read The Wizard of Oz.... before anything else. All I know is about a few characters and something about a tornado whisking Dorothy and Toto away to somewhere else.
Clearly, it is a legendary North American story!!

Nari

EricM
11-12-2006, 01:48 AM
Nari the whole script is online, just a google away.
I've found the thread quite interesting, as usual. Barrett I've a couple of patients I'm going to give a copy of Surrender, Dorothy to this week.

This page on the symbolism of OZ characters (http://www.turnmeondeadman.net/OZ/Symbolism.html) suggests the tornado is the "physical manifestation of Dorothy Gale's inner struggle for self-awareness, the result of the 'gale' winds storming through her psyche." This may be what you symbolize to your students Barrett; you've flung open the door to the storm cellar in the middle of the storm (picture a flash of lightening illuminating a large man prying back the door as howling winds, and torrential rain pours in on the frightened people huddling below). Way to go Barrett.
Trust me, this scenario is way better than the other interpretation of The Tornado offered on this link.

Eric

nari
11-12-2006, 03:05 AM
Thanks Eric

Nari

nari
11-12-2006, 06:26 AM
Well, as usual, I'm still in the dark...I read what I thought was the book online, but there was no Marvel, and Dorothy simply arrives home; Aunt Em is pleased and that's the End.
Must have been an abridged version for kids... never mind.

Nari

Barrett Dorko
11-12-2006, 02:14 PM
For most, the “home” of the clinic is represented by rigid plan and protocol. They always know what’s going to happen next and if it doesn’t happen as expected there’s always the patient to blame. They think that life has a single rhythm; that it’s cyclical and not really in need of any special attention. But no less than Richard Dawkins when writing about what might signal life on other planets says, “Nothing simply rhythmic would announce our intelligent presence to the waiting universe.”

I leave these classes and it is as if a storm has passed. Even before lunch many retreat to the storm cellars in their heads where they are comforted by the memory of success with patients past. Their resistance to anything contrary to the normal sequence of clinical care is reinforced by a variety of “beliefs” that form the foundation of their approach. No amount of reason is likely to change that.

But if we were to separate the body into that which is predictable and that which is random we’d say that the nervous system behaved in the latter fashion and the mesoderm the former. Of course, most would prefer to live on the farm where each day is pretty much like any other and muscular strength is more important than understanding.

Dorothy, for whatever reason, is drawn into the storm, and, as she says, “Some of it is terrible and some of it is beautiful.” In Oz the rhythms are varied and eccentric, much like the neurologically involved patient, and vigilance is now required if progress is to be made.

The end result of all this? Persistent neurogenic pain is simply not treated in a fashion that makes sense or is likely to result in enduring relief. My evidence? Half of the therapists in my classes last week suffered from chronic pain. In California this week that will be true again.

Bas
11-12-2006, 02:30 PM
PTs seem to fall into 3 groups in this "Oz":

The large group represented by:

Back home Auntie Em and her friends would still talk about the tornado - analyzing its features and aspects and threats. Yet not getting anywhere fast.


And a small group represented by:

Dorothy follows Toto (Diane - "toto"= Latin for "everything" as well) through the tornado and has her worldview shifted.

A very small subgroup plays a major role as the gurus, represented by:

The wizard.

Barrett Dorko
11-12-2006, 02:54 PM
Bas,

I agree.

There's my essay Tin Men (http://www.barrettdorko.com/articles/tinmen.htm) about how caring for rather than training our patients might make any therapist appear wizardly as well.